Wall Street WARZONE
CIA Agents “Moonlighting” for Wall Street, Teaching Hedge Funds New “Deception” Secrets to Manipulate Investors. Is CIA Taking Eyes Off National Security?
by Paul B Farrell, JD, PhD
| Discuss | Print | 5/7/2010

This beats a Tom Clancy spy thriller, you can’t make up spooky stuff like this: America’s “in the midst of two wars and the fight against Al Qaeda” and our “CIA is offering operatives a chance to peddle their expertise to private companies on the side — a policy that gives financial firms and hedge funds access to the nation’s top-level intelligence talent,” writes Eamon Javers in a must-read special report in Politico, CIA moonlights in corporate world. Doesn’t the CIA have enough to do in protecting America? Do they really have lots of extra time on their hands? If derivatives are the “weapons of financial mass destruction,” as Warren Buffett calls them, this policy is as dumb and as dangerous as selling nuclear weapons to terrorists. Why the hell is CIA endangering America’s security?

But even worse for investors, Javers says the CIA is “in one case, these active-duty officers moonlighted at a hedge-fund consulting firm that wanted to tap their expertise in ‘deception detection,’ the highly specialized art of telling when executives may be lying based on clues in a conversation.” Yes, and how to deceive and manipulate Main Street America’s 95 million investors.

The Politico piece comes from Javers’ new book, ‘Broker, Trader, Lawyer, Spy: The Secret World of Corporate Espionage.’  Javers says this “never-before-revealed policy comes to light as the CIA and other intelligence agencies are once again under fire for failing to connect the ‘dots,’ this time in the Christmas Day bombing plot on Northwest Flight 253 … Sources familiar with the CIA’s moonlighting policy defend it as a vital tool to prevent brain-drain at Langley, which has seen an exodus of highly trained, badly needed intelligence officers to the private sector, where they can easily double or even triple their government salaries.

The policy gives agents a chance to earn more while still staying on the government payroll. A government official familiar with the policy insists it doesn’t impede the CIA’s work on critical national security investigations. This official said CIA officers who want to participate in it must first submit a detailed explanation of the type of work involved and get permission from higher-ups within the agency.” Once again, money and individual greed win out.

Warning: Under the cover of secrecy, the lure of huge salaries, and likely a few discrete campaign donations, we ‘re seeing one more sneaky trick hedge funds, Wall Street and the “Happy Conspiracy” octopus are using to take control of America’s government.

Pentagon “Psy-Ops” War Strategies: Wall Street’s Secret Weapon!
by Paul B Farrell, JD, PhD
| Discuss | Print | 4/27/2010

“PSY-OPS WARFARE”
The Doctrine of Joint Psychological Operations

Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Department of Defense

“The purpose of psychological operations (PSYOP) is to induce or reinforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the originator’s objectives. Psychological operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence the emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. PSYOP are a vital part of the broad range of US diplomatic, informational, military, and economic activities. PSYOP characteristically are delivered as information for effect, used during peacetime and conflict, to inform and influence. When properly employed, PSYOP can save lives of friendly and/or adversary forces by reducing adversaries’ will to fight. By lowering adversary morale and reducing their efficiency, PSYOP can also discourage aggressive actions and create dissidence and disaffection within their ranks, ultimately inducing surrender.” (More)

“War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We’re a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted to Drugs (& War!) America’s Insatiable Demand is the Problem, Not Mexican Suppliers.
by Paul B Farrell, JD, PhD
| Discuss | Print | 4/20/2010

Want to know the real reason ”The War on Drugs Is Doomed,” as Mary Anastasia O’Grady says in a Journal column? She’s on the right track: “The first step in dealing with a problem is acknowledging that you have one … Some 7,000 troops now patrol Juárez, a city of roughly one million … Juárez is today a killing field … Yet even militarization has not delivered the peace. The reason is simple enough: The source of the problem is not Mexican suppliers. It is American demand coupled with prohibition.”

Actually, the real problem’s much deeper … deep in our culture, psyche and brains: America is a warring nation. Yes, we love war, any kind. War defines who we are. War makes us feel powerful. Wars solve our ideological problems. War makes special interests very rich. War keeps our self-perpetuating Pentagon war machine eating up about 40% of our national budget.  The same ideology and DNA that drove us into an unnecessary war in Iraq, the “worst foreign policy blunder in American history,” led us into creating a “War on Drugs.” But a war strategy is not working, just the opposite, it’s fueling and accelerating the problem. As O’Grady aptly puts it: “Violence along the border has skyrocketed ever since Mexican President Felipe Calderón decided to confront the illegal drug cartels that operate there.”

Last year my column, “Drug wars: Big Pharma, Afghan, Mexican cartels” got a huge positive response from American police officers who agreed: “The truth is, there is no ‘War on Drugs’ to win, nor to lose, just millions of addicts who need help.” We are a “Nation of Addicts,” and a costly “War on Drugs” down in Mexico won’t solve our addiction problem up here in America, we are wasting enormous taxpayer dollars. In short, until we grow up and drop the macho “War on Drugs” mindset, violence will accelerate, expanding here in America, as we fail to lessen demand. Here’s my analysis from MarketWatch: (More)