Financial innovation pioneer Rick Bookstaber predicted the meltdown in his 2007 Demon of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge Funds & the Perils of Financial Innovation. Recently he debated the value of “financial innovations” in an Oxford-style debate at The Economist’s Buttonwood Gathering in October 2009. Nobelist Myron Scholes, the chairman of Platinum Grove, and Putnam’s CEO Robert Reynolds argued for “financial innovations.” Jeremy Grantham the CEO of GMO was on the other side with Bookstaber. Afterwards, Bookstaber summarized his message on SeekingAlpha. Here are three of his strongest criticisms:
Market Efficiency. Q: “Do innovative products promote growth by increasing market efficiency? A: The objective in the design and marketing of innovative products is not market efficiency, but profitability for the banks. And market efficiency is the bane of profitability. The last thing a bank would want is a competitive, efficient market, because then it would not be able to extract economic rents. So the incentives are to create innovative products that reduce market efficiency, not enhance it. How is this done? Well, I can quickly think of two ways. First, by creating informational asymmetries, by having products that are difficult for the users to understand a price. And the second is by designing innovative products, which, due to their non-standard nature, allow the banks to extract higher transaction costs.” (More)
