Wall Street WARZONE

“War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We’re a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted to Drugs (& War!) America’s Insatiable Demand is the Problem, Not Mexican Suppliers.

by Paul B Farrell, JD, PhD
| | 4/20/2010

Want to know the real reason ”The War on Drugs Is Doomed,” as Mary Anastasia O’Grady says in a Journal column? She’s on the right track: “The first step in dealing with a problem is acknowledging that you have one … Some 7,000 troops now patrol Juárez, a city of roughly one million … Juárez is today a killing field … Yet even militarization has not delivered the peace. The reason is simple enough: The source of the problem is not Mexican suppliers. It is American demand coupled with prohibition.”

Actually, the real problem’s much deeper … deep in our culture, psyche and brains: America is a warring nation. Yes, we love war, any kind. War defines who we are. War makes us feel powerful. Wars solve our ideological problems. War makes special interests very rich. War keeps our self-perpetuating Pentagon war machine eating up about 40% of our national budget.  The same ideology and DNA that drove us into an unnecessary war in Iraq, the “worst foreign policy blunder in American history,” led us into creating a “War on Drugs.” But a war strategy is not working, just the opposite, it’s fueling and accelerating the problem. As O’Grady aptly puts it: “Violence along the border has skyrocketed ever since Mexican President Felipe Calderón decided to confront the illegal drug cartels that operate there.”

Last year my column, “Drug wars: Big Pharma, Afghan, Mexican cartels” got a huge positive response from American police officers who agreed: “The truth is, there is no ‘War on Drugs’ to win, nor to lose, just millions of addicts who need help.” We are a “Nation of Addicts,” and a costly “War on Drugs” down in Mexico won’t solve our addiction problem up here in America, we are wasting enormous taxpayer dollars. In short, until we grow up and drop the macho “War on Drugs” mindset, violence will accelerate, expanding here in America, as we fail to lessen demand. Here’s my analysis from MarketWatch:

Mexican drug lord “El Chapo” made the Forbes list of billionaires in 2009. Seriously, you can’t make this stuff up: He runs the Sinaloa cartel, a major supplier of cocaine to the United States. He’s an assassin, another bin Laden … and Forbes honors him right up there with the world billionaires. But that got me thinking: In legitimizing “El Chapo” isn’t Forbes edging us toward decriminalizing all illegal drugs? Farfetched? Or maybe signaling a fundamental shift in America’s attitude toward illegal drugs? Suppose I were back at Morgan Stanley, asked to write a securities report for America’s healthcare industry, on Big Pharma? Review competition, market share, new profit opportunities when decriminalization of marijuana expands to other illegal drugs like cocaine and heroin, a megabuck market.

Yes, I said “when.” Eventually it could happen. Think of states like California. They’re going to vote on it. They’re facing a $42 billion deficit. They see their $14 billion marijuana crop as a new source of tax revenue. Legalize it. Tax it. Psychologist Anne Wilson Schaef saw the trend coming a couple decades ago: We’re a “Nation of Addicts … our society is deteriorating at an alarming rate.” Why? We refuse to face the real problem: Demand. Legalizing it will. 

We refuse to face the real problem: It’s not the supply chain, it’s demand. Psychologist Anne Wilson Schaef saw the trend coming a couple decades ago: America is a “Nation of Addicts … our society is deteriorating at an alarming rate.” We’re losing the war. In a “nation of addicts” it doesn’t matter if drugs are legal or not … where the drugs come from … who gets hurt … nor if we have to waste hundreds of billions fighting ineffective wars to protect suppliers … a corrupt Afghan government, the source of 95% of the world’s heroin … or Mexico, the main traffic route for wholesalers feeding America’s addicts … or Big Pharma the biggest pusher for prescription drug addicts … when a “nation of addicts” needs a fix, they always find it.

New, bigger profits if Big Pharma expands into illicit drugs?

There’s so much money being made in illegal drugs that the legalization of pot really is a sign of what’s ahead. More drugs will be legalized and controlled. Big Pharma will want in the action. Why not? They’re public companies: They must satisfy stockholders with new products, new markets, higher earnings and stock prices. Big Pharma’s strategy is clear, they have more salesmen than scientists developing new drugs, and their efforts to kill healthcare reform speaks volumes. So why not legalize all drugs, for new profits?

Seriously, drugs are a mega-business … America spends about $2.5 trillion on healthcare annually … including $315 billion Big Pharma revenues last year … they must be secretly exploring the untapped market in illicit drug traffic that siphons off an estimated $400 billion annually … plus keep in mind another $175 billion on alcoholic addiction.

If Big Pharma can capture part of the market share that’s now going to competing Mexican and Afghan drug warlords, then they can feed their shareholders addiction to earnings, feed their CEOs’ addiction for mega-million paychecks, while capitalizing on the American addicts need for a fix. We just need to end our moralistic charade, decriminalize and control all illicit drugs. Plus it’ll generate new tax revenues.

You can bet this opportunity is being actively explored deep inside Big Pharma, purely for economic reasons, and secretly, of course, like the tobacco industry’s studies of carcinogens in cigarettes. So if I were back at Morgan Stanley preparing a securities report on the implications of expanding Big Pharma’s market share when more drugs are legitimized, there are three studies that must be highlighted:

One. Failed drug policies breeding new terrorists and narco-states.

Things are worse today than two years ago when Foreign Policymagazine used the work of 100 experts in their “Third Terrorist Index …instead of treating the demand for illegal drugs as a market, and addicts as patients, governments continue to pursue policies that have boosted the profits of drug lords and fostered narcostates that threaten all of us.” Like Afghanistan: Narcotics is a cash crop. Unfortunately, Washington and the Pentagon fail to see that we’re feeding our disease, matching our addiction to illegal drugs here in America (demand) with the entrepreneurial spirit of Afghan government bureaucrats, farmers, Mexican traffickers and the Taliban (suppliers), while misusing our military. The Washington Post says “the drug war has become the Taliban’s most effective recruiter,” a source of financing making them “richer and stronger by the day.”

Two. America’s 40-year “War on Drugs” is a “dismal failure”

About the same time Forbesrewarded “El Chapo” with the star status, the NY Timesreported: “Three former Latin American leaders,” ex-presidents of Mexico, Brazil and Columbia, “called on President Obama to rethink America’s campaign against illegal drugs, which they blame for helping to foment crime, corruption and political instability in Latin America while failing to reduce the availability of drugs in America.” America’s been in a misguided “War on Drugs” for since the Nixon era, and it just gets worse. Still we hang onto a failed policy that costs hundreds of billions, drives drug traffic underground, raising the price of a commodity that costs pennies. We’re creating the opposite result, increasing demand. Maybe that’s exactly what Big Pharma wants, more addicts to feed its business model. And exactly what our “nation of addicts” wants, a steady fix … maybe it’s time to accept reality, stop fighting it, work with it.

Three. Mexican drug cartels using Harvard B-School corporate models

In a confidential report to Big Pharma you’d also find a summary of Guy Larson’s brilliant assessment, “How the Cartels Work” in Rolling Stone.The subtitle suggests tacit market-sharing and territory-splitting deals involving Big Pharma, domestic healthcare firms, and foreign drug cartels: “Mexican drug lords have transformed the narcotics trade in America – and the DEA appears powerless to stop them.” America powerless?

“One of the strangest things about the drug war that is tearing Mexico apart is how little of the bloodshed has spilled over the border,” says Lawson. “On one side of the Rio Grande is Ciudad Juárez, one of the most violent cities on the planet, with 1,600 drug-related murders last year. On the other side is El Paso, Texas, the third-safest city in America, with only 18 killings. The 100-to-1 disparity in murders underscores a little-understood reality in the War on Drugs: The current crop of Mexican drug lords is not a bunch of Scarface-style lunatics high on coke and hell-bent on violence. Instead, they are highly sophisticated executives, pursuing profit by the cheapest and most efficient means possible.”

Yes, they’re using Harvard-style B-School models: “Rather than resort to violence in U.S. cities, the Mexican cartels have outsourced street-level grunt work to an army of illegal immigrants.” Forbes’ light satire oaints “El Chapo” as a B-movie bandito with a price on his head. By comparison, Lawson’s chilling piece reads like a first-class press release about a Wall Street CEO: Mexican cartels are run by “highly sophisticated executives, pursuing profit by the cheapest and most efficient means possible. Torturing rivals and beheading victims serves a purpose in Mexico, where drug-related violence has killed 12,000 people in the past three years; narcotraficantes routinely use brutality to subdue competitors, eliminate witnesses and frighten off police recruits.”

Meanwhile, “north of the border, the drug lords are as corporate and hyperorganized as Walmart replacing the top-down approach of their Colombian predecessors with a new business model – one that outsources the street-level grunt work to an army of illegal immigrants,” says Lawson. It’s a business model that works so well they don’t want to upset it: “With business booming – prices are steady and demand remains high – unleashing a Mexican-style rampage in this country would only risk riling up U.S. law enforcement.” In that way, the Mexican cartels resemble Big Pharma’s efforts to kill healthcare reform in America, neither wants to upset a very profitable business model.

“War on Drugs” is dead, wasting billions of taxpayer dollars … time to change our policies

The truth is, there’s no “War on Drugs” to win, nor to lose, just millions of addicts who need help. I’ve been in recovery thirty-six years. Back in the eighties I worked professionally with hundreds who went through places like Betty Ford Center. Statistics show that over 10% of Americans are physiologically predisposed to addictive behavior. That will never change. It’s in our DNA. “El Chapo” sure sees the profit potential. The military only sees an enemy. So we keep wasting money fighting ineffective “supply-side” drug wars places like Mexico, Afghanistan and Columbia. Instead of helping addicts. We’ve learned so little since Prohibition. The real problem is demand, not supply. So we’ll keep losing our “War on Drugs” till we fundamentally shift our policies.

Mexican MBA types get it: “Mexican cartels aren’t fighting the War on Drugs in the United States for a very simple reason: They’ve already won,” concludes Lawson. Given that painful reality, Big Pharma should wise up and get ahead of the legalization trend. Lead it. If Big Pharma capitalizes on their unique experience, they can capture new products and new markets driven by the relentless demand for a fix. Lead in the development of a new national policy shifting away from military action to treatment, decriminalization and regulation, generate new sources of tax revenues, and help millions of addicted Americans.

In MarketWatch: “Drug wars: Big Pharma, Afghan, Mexican cartels.” 10.13.09

6 Responses to “War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We’re a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted to Drugs (& War!) America’s Insatiable Demand is the Problem, Not Mexican Suppliers.
  • “War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We're a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted … says:

    [...] original here: “War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We're a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted … Post a [...]

    Log in to Reply
  • Another doomed plan to prevent foreclosures – MarketWatch : World online news says:

    [...] “War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We're a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted … [...]

    Log in to Reply
  • Forex: AUD/USD retreats from 0.9200 resistance | Insider Forex Secrets Guide says:

    [...] “War &#959&#1495 Drugs” Doomed? Yes, W&#1077're a “Nation &#959f Addicts,” Addicted &#82… [...]

    Log in to Reply
  • “War On Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We’re A “Nation Of Addicts,” Addicted To Drugs (& War!) Our Insatiable Demand’s The Problem, Not Mexican & Afghan Suppliers. says:

    [...] "War On Drugs" Doomed? Yes, We're A "Nation Of Addicts," Addicted To Drugs … [...]

    Log in to Reply
  • &Ldquo;War On Drugs&Rdquo; Doomed? Yes, We&Rsquo;Re A &Ldquo;Nation Of Addicts,&Rdquo; Addicted To Drugs (& War!) America&Rsquo;S Insatiable Demand Is The Problem, Not Mexican Suppliers. says:

    [...] &Ldquo;War On Drugs&Rdquo; Doomed? Yes, We&Rsquo;Re A &Ldquo;Nation Of Addicts,&Rdquo; Addicted To D… [...]

    Log in to Reply
  • Country mexican pb style says:

    [...] “War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We're a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted 20 Apr 2010. Yes, they're using Harvard-style B-School models: “Rather than. high – unleashing a Mexican-style rampage in this country would only risk. – “War on Drugs” Doomed? Yes, We're a “Nation of Addicts,” Addicted [...]

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.